MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Faculty and Researchers
  • Rowe, Mary
  • 01. The Organizational Ombud's Role: Functions, Standards of Practice, and Effectiveness and Value
  • I. The Functions, Standards of Practice, and Professional Values of Organizational Ombuds
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • Faculty and Researchers
  • Rowe, Mary
  • 01. The Organizational Ombud's Role: Functions, Standards of Practice, and Effectiveness and Value
  • I. The Functions, Standards of Practice, and Professional Values of Organizational Ombuds
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Dealing with—or Reporting—‘Unacceptable’ Behavior

Author(s)
Rowe, Mary; Wilcox, Linda; Gadlin, Howard
Thumbnail
DownloadArticle (280.7Kb)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
People in organizations often see behavior that they think is unacceptable, unsafe, illegal—even criminal. Why do people who observe such behavior hesitate to act on their own, or to come forward promptly—even when affected by that behavior? Why do they not immediately report those whom they see to be acting in an intolerable fashion? Hesitation of this kind has been recognized for years; for example, there is a controversial literature about the “bystander effect.” In real life hesitation is not confined just to bystanders. People in all roles may hesitate to act. Why do some people—including many managers—waver, rather than acting effectively to stop behavior they find to be unacceptable? The most common reasons for hesitation are: fear of loss of relationships, and loss of privacy, fear of unspecified “bad consequences” or retaliation, and insufficient evidence. There are many other barriers and they are often complex. Perceptions of the organization and of supervisors are important, as is a complaint system that is seen to be safe, accessible and credible. Some people do act on the spot or come forward when they see unacceptable behavior. Reviewing the reasoning of people with whom we have talked may provide ideas for employers designing or reviewing a conflict management system.
Date issued
2009
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156663
Publisher
Journal of the International Ombudsman Association
Citation
Mary Rowe, Linda Wilcox, and Howard Gadlin, “Dealing with—or Reporting—‘Unacceptable’ Behavior,” Journal of the International Ombudsman Association Vol. 2, No. 1 (Winter 2009): 52-64.
Keywords
bystander effect, retaliation, whistleblower, conflict systems, complaint options, organizational ombudsman, workplace trust, workplace fear, procedural justice

Collections
  • 05. Bystanders and the Bystanders of Bystanders
  • 1. Harassment
  • Harassment and Bullying
  • I. The Functions, Standards of Practice, and Professional Values of Organizational Ombuds
  • II. Ombuds Articles that Include De-Identified, Disguised Case Material
  • Integrated Conflict Management Systems (ICMS) and the Organizational Ombuds’ Role Therein

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.