Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorE. Eric Adams and Richard de Neufville.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf Graf, Esther, 1971-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-08-19T19:41:37Z
dc.date.available2005-08-19T19:41:37Z
dc.date.copyright1999en_US
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9718
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering; and, (S.M.M.O.T.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Technology and Policy Program, 1999.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 168-174).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis describes how the hydrologic computer model HSPF was used to model hydrologic and sediment transport in the Charles River Watershed and subsequently to evaluate stormwater management practices in the watershed. The thesis briefly describes the problem of stormwater pollution. It discusses U.S. federal laws, regulations and programs that are intended to address the issue, and then focuses on the state of Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Department of Envi­ronmental Protection (DEP) has recently issued Stormwater Management Standards, which are used as guidelines by Conservation Commissions throughout the state, and which will soon become part of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations, DEP's Stormwater Management Standards require the use of any number of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will reduce the average annual load of total suspended solids (TSS) in stormwater by 80%. This thesis briefly describes some common BMPs and discusses the validity of using TSS as a target pollutant. The thesis then describes in detail how the HSPF computer model was calibrated to predict sediment washoff and transport in the Charles River Watershed. It, then shows how the model was used to test the effectiveness of DEP's Stormwater Management Standards. The Standards were applied to the town of Franklin in the lower part of the watershed by changing the land use in the town in order to simulate development. The solids load from this new development was then reduced by 80%. According to the model predictions, if the Standards are applied only to the part of the watershed that falls under the jurisdiction of the law, then there might be little improvement seen in the river, However, if the standards arc applied wherever development occurs in the town, there may be noticeable improvement in tho levels of TSS concentration in the Charles River.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Esther Wolf Graf.en_US
dc.format.extent174 p.en_US
dc.format.extent12560484 bytes
dc.format.extent12560243 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.subjectTechnology and Policy Programen_US
dc.titleUsing HSPF to evaluate stormwater Best Management Practices in the Charles River Watersheden_US
dc.title.alternativeUsing Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN to evaluate stormwater BMPs in the Charles River Watersheden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.M.O.T.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTechnology and Policy Program
dc.identifier.oclc42677443en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record