Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOlivier L. de Weck, Eric S. Rebentisch and Mark W. Thomas.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDobson, Aaron T. (Aaron Travis)en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-08T15:30:36Z
dc.date.available2014-10-08T15:30:36Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90810
dc.descriptionThesis: Nav. E., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Engineering and Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, System Design and Management Program, 2014.en_US
dc.description"June 2014." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 76-80).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs the sophistication and technology of ships increases, U.S. Navy shipbuilding must be an effective and cost-efficient acquirer of technology-dense one-of-a-kind ships all while meeting significant cost and schedule constraints in a fluctuating demand environment. A drive to provide world-class technology to the U.S. Navy's warfighters necessitates increasingly complex ships, which further augments the non-trivial problem of providing cost effective, on-schedule ships for the American taxpayer. The primary objective of this study was to quantify, assess, and analyze cost-predictive complexity-oriented benchmarks in the pre-construction phase of the U.S. Navy's ship acquisition process. This study used commercially-available software such as Mathwork's MATLAB software to analyze the numerical cost data and assess the fidelity of the predictive benchmarks to the datasets. The end result was that a consideration of complexity via the methods and algorithms established in this study supported an exponential cost versus complexity relationship to refine the current cost estimation methods and software currently in use in U.S. Navy shipbuilding. Specifically, it was found that for the subsystems under analysis, acquisition/contract cost per unit was highly correlated with unit complexity according to the relationship, cost/unit ($M,USD) = 23.100 + e 0.015C.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Aaron T. Dobson.en_US
dc.format.extent111 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.subjectEngineering Systems Division.en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleCost prediction via quantitative analysis of complexity in U.S. Navy shipbuildingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeNav. E.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.identifier.oclc891655247en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record