Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJohn E. Fernandez.en_US
dc.contributor.authorElbaum, Meredith Sue, 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-13T17:44:21Z
dc.date.available2011-09-13T17:44:21Z
dc.date.copyright2003en_US
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/65732
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2003.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 100-105).en_US
dc.description.abstractSustainable design, whether referred to as green, high performing, responsible, or environmentally, socially, and economically responsive architecture, is influencing the global building industry. Most major firms of architecture including Gensler, Hellmuth, Obata, Kassabaum, and Skidmore Owings and Merrill, are designing green buildings. Growth in programs like Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), the United States and Great Britain's respective green building rating programs, illustrate the rising trend to go "green" within the industry. There are many obstacles facing the growth of the green building industry. While most architects admit green architecture is non-dismissable, because of these obstacles, they continue to design a majority of buildings with little consideration for environmental impact. Many of these obstacles can be overcome with the right resources. Resources already exist to assist designers in lessening the environmental impact of buildings. However, there is a clear disconnect between available resources and the design professionals they target. Professionals, for the most part, do not know what these tools are, where to find them, who should use them, and when to use them in the design process. This thesis bridges this disconnect between design professionals and available resources. It suggests appropriate strategies for a prescribed design phase based upon environmental impact, building system, and design professional, and presents a list of resources for each strategy. Its aim is to disseminate resources to the appropriate professionals so that they can make informed decisions during the design process relative to environmental impact. Manifested in the form of an interactive web-based tool, it lends itself to future development. An increase in informed decisions will inevitably decrease the negative impact buildings have on the environment.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Meredith Sue Elbaum.en_US
dc.format.extent105 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleBridgeGreen : bridging the disconnect between design professionals and resources fro environmentally, socially, and economically responsive architectureen_US
dc.title.alternativeBridge Greenen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc53295524en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record