Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDagan, Yuval
dc.contributor.authorDaskalakis, Constantinos
dc.contributor.authorFishelson, Maxwell
dc.contributor.authorGolowich, Noah
dc.contributor.authorKleinberg, Robert
dc.contributor.authorOkoroafor, Princewill
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T19:15:52Z
dc.date.available2026-01-16T19:15:52Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-15
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-4007-1510-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164548
dc.descriptionSTOC ’25, Prague, Czechiaen_US
dc.description.abstractA set of probabilistic forecasts is calibrated if each prediction of the forecaster closely approximates the empirical distribution of outcomes on the subset of timesteps where that prediction was made. We study the fundamental problem of online calibrated forecasting of binary sequences, which was initially studied by Foster and Vohra. They derived an algorithm with O(T2/3) calibration error after T time steps, and showed a lower bound of Ω(T1/2). These bounds remained stagnant for two decades, until Qiao and Valiant improved the lower bound to Ω(T0.528) by introducing a combinatorial game called sign preservation and showing that lower bounds for this game imply lower bounds for calibration. In this paper, we give the first improvement to the O(T2/3) upper bound on calibration error of Foster and Vohra. We do this by introducing a variant of Qiao and Valiant’s game that we call sign preservation with reuse (SPR). We prove that the relationship between SPR and calibrated forecasting is bidirectional: not only do lower bounds for SPR translate into lower bounds for calibration, but algorithms for SPR also translate into new algorithms for calibrated forecasting. We then give an improved upper bound for the SPR game, which implies, via our equivalence, a forecasting algorithm with calibration error O(T2/3 − ) for some > 0, improving Foster and Vohra’s upper bound for the first time. Using similar ideas, we then prove a slightly stronger lower bound than that of Qiao and Valiant, namely Ω(T0.54389). Our lower bound is obtained by an oblivious adversary, marking the first ω(T1/2) calibration lower bound for oblivious adversaries.en_US
dc.publisherACM|Proceedings of the 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computingen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3717823.3718178en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceAssociation for Computing Machineryen_US
dc.titleBreaking the T^(2/3) Barrier for Sequential Calibrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationYuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis, Maxwell Fishelson, Noah Golowich, Robert Kleinberg, and Princewill Okoroafor. 2025. Breaking the T^(2/3) Barrier for Sequential Calibration. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2007–2018.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_POLICY
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-08-01T08:39:47Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe author(s)
dspace.date.submission2025-08-01T08:39:48Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record