Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAxel Kilian and Lawrence Sass.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMason, Molly,S.M.Massachusetts Institute of Technology.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T21:28:15Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T21:28:15Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127874
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, May, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from the official PDF of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 60-62).en_US
dc.description.abstractWithin the contemporary practice of architecture, what we design determines how we make it. Digital fabrication provides designers the opportunity to directly link digital models with CNC equipment such as robotics. While beneficial this direct link eliminates the ability for a craftsperson to adjust forms on-site using their knowledge of material and process. To reintroduce the flexibility of the crafts process and take advantage of material and tool capabilities, it is necessary to embed this craft knowledge into the design model itself in a series of craft decisions. Such craft decisions include both the "live" choices made while making, which pull from past experiences, material behavior, and tacit knowledge, and the choice of how one formalizes descriptions of making. The act of making consists of both how material is shaped into parts and how these parts come together to participate as a whole.en_US
dc.description.abstractHowever, fifteen years of industrial robotic research has examined the acts of fabrication and assembly separately. This does not consider bidirectional relationship between part formation and assembly where customized parts require new modes of assembly and assembly requires certain formal part characteristics for handling. In this thesis, I propose the integration of robotic fabrication and assembly constraints into the design process to use as drivers for form-finding. The framework for this is created through codifying material processes and assembly logics into making verbs which act as descriptions of tools, material, and movement. Through the combination of multiple verbs, the designer is able to explore formal design spaces which are informed by fabrication and assembly constraints. The design of parts is kept "live" during the process of making, capable of being altered based on constraints of material process and assembly.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe resultant workflows propose an active dialogue between design, fabrication, and assembly where the act of making is described through actions rather than explicit geometrical models.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Molly Mason.en_US
dc.format.extent64 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleCrafting decisions : integrating design, fabrication, and assembly for six-axis robotic armsen_US
dc.title.alternativeIntegrating design, fabrication, and assembly for six-axis robotic armsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architectureen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1196831431en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architectureen_US
dspace.imported2020-10-08T21:28:13Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentArchen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record