Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStokes, Leah
dc.contributor.authorGiang, Amanda Chi Wen
dc.contributor.authorSelin, Noelle E
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-19T18:43:39Z
dc.date.available2017-06-19T18:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.issn1526-3800
dc.identifier.issn1536-0091
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110017
dc.description.abstractInternational environmental negotiations often involve conflicts between developed and developing countries. However, considering environmental cooperation in a North-South dichotomy obscures important variation within the Global South, particularly as emerging economies become more important politically, economically, and environmentally. This article examines change in the Southern coalition in environmental negotiations, using the recently concluded Minamata Convention on Mercury as its primary case. Focusing on India and China, we argue that three key factors explain divergence in their positions as the negotiations progressed: domestic resources and regulatory politics, development constraints, and domestic scientific and technological capacity. We conclude that the intersection between scientific and technological development and domestic policy is of increasing importance in shaping emerging economies’ engagement in international environmental negotiations. We also discuss how this divergence is affecting international environmental cooperation on other issues, including the ozone and climate negotiations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMIT Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00378en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT Pressen_US
dc.titleSplitting the South: China and India’s Divergence in International Environmental Negotiationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationStokes, Leah C.; Giang, Amanda and Selin, Noelle E. “Splitting the South: China and India’s Divergence in International Environmental Negotiations.” Global Environmental Politics 16, no. 4 (November 2016): 12–31 © 2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorStokes, Leah
dc.contributor.mitauthorGiang, Amanda Chi Wen
dc.contributor.mitauthorSelin, Noelle E
dc.relation.journalGlobal Environmental Politicsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsStokes, Leah C.; Giang, Amanda; Selin, Noelle E.en_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-7038
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-5622
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record