Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Hsin-Yu
dc.contributor.authorHolz, Daniel E.
dc.contributor.authorKatsavounidis, Erotokritos
dc.contributor.authorEssick, Reed Clasey
dc.contributor.authorVitale, Salvatore
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-02T19:55:56Z
dc.date.available2017-06-02T19:55:56Z
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.date.submitted2016-07
dc.identifier.issn1538-4357
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/109566
dc.description.abstractGround-based interferometers are not perfect all-sky instruments, and it is important to account for their behavior when considering the distribution of detected events. In particular, the LIGO detectors are most sensitive to sources above North America and the Indian Ocean, and as the Earth rotates, the sensitive regions are swept across the sky. However, because the detectors do not acquire data uniformly over time, there is a net bias on detectable sources' right ascensions. Both LIGO detectors preferentially collect data during their local night; it is more than twice as likely to be local midnight than noon when both detectors are operating. We discuss these selection effects and how they impact LIGO's observations and electromagnetic (EM) follow-up. Beyond galactic foregrounds associated with seasonal variations, we find that equatorial observatories can access over 80% of the localization probability, while mid-latitudes will access closer to 70%. Facilities located near the two LIGO sites can observe sources closer to their zenith than their analogs in the south, but the average observation will still be no closer than 44° from zenith. We also find that observatories in Africa or the South Atlantic will wait systematically longer before they can begin observing compared to the rest of the world; though, there is a preference for longitudes near the LIGOs. These effects, along with knowledge of the LIGO antenna pattern, can inform EM follow-up activities and optimization, including the possibility of directing observations even before gravitational-wave events occur.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipLaser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatoryen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/31en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceIOP Publishingen_US
dc.titleOBSERVATIONAL SELECTION EFFECTS WITH GROUND-BASED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationChen, Hsin-Yu, Reed Essick, Salvatore Vitale, Daniel E. Holz, and Erik Katsavounidis. “OBSERVATIONAL SELECTION EFFECTS WITH GROUND-BASED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS.” The Astrophysical Journal 835, no. 1 (January 16, 2017): 31. © 2017 The American Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentLIGO (Observatory : Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Researchen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorKatsavounidis, Erotokritos
dc.contributor.mitauthorEssick, Reed Clasey
dc.contributor.mitauthorVitale, Salvatore
dc.relation.journalAstrophysical Journalen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsChen, Hsin-Yu; Essick, Reed; Vitale, Salvatore; Holz, Daniel E.; Katsavounidis, Eriken_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-3045
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8196-9267
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-0767
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record