Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlshamsi, Aamena
dc.contributor.authorPianesi, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorLepri, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorPentland, Alex Paul
dc.contributor.authorRahwan, Iyad
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-09T14:45:07Z
dc.date.available2016-06-09T14:45:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.date.submitted2015-07
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103078
dc.description.abstractPeople divide their time unequally among their social contacts due to time constraints and varying strength of relationships. It was found that high diversity of social communication, dividing time more evenly among social contacts, is correlated with economic well-being both at macro and micro levels. Besides economic well-being, it is not clear how the diversity of social communication is also associated with the two components of individuals’ subjective well-being, positive and negative affect. Specifically, positive affect and negative affect are two independent dimensions representing the experience (feeling) of emotions. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the daily diversity of social communication and dynamic affect states that people experience in their daily lives. We collected two high-resolution datasets that capture affect scores via daily experience sampling surveys and social interaction through wearable sensing technologies: sociometric badges for face-to-face interaction and smart phones for mobile phone calls. We found that communication diversity correlates with desirable affect states–e.g. an increase in the positive affect state or a decrease in the negative affect state–for some personality types, but correlates with undesirable affect states for others. For example, diversity in phone calls is experienced as good by introverts, but bad by extroverts; diversity in face-to-face interaction is experienced as good by people who tend to be positive by nature (trait) but bad for people who tend to be not positive by nature. More broadly, the moderating effect of personality type on the relationship between diversity and affect was detected without any knowledge of the type of social tie or the content of communication. This provides further support for the power of unobtrusive sensing in understanding social dynamics, and in measuring the effect of potential interventions designed to improve well-being.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSeventh Framework Programme (European Commission) (PCOFUND-GA-2008_226070)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152358en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.titleNetwork Diversity and Affect Dynamics: The Role of Personality Traitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationAlshamsi, Aamena, Fabio Pianesi, Bruno Lepri, Alex Pentland, and Iyad Rahwan. “Network Diversity and Affect Dynamics: The Role of Personality Traits.” Edited by Alain Barrat. PLoS ONE 11, no. 4 (April 1, 2016): e0152358.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLepri, Brunoen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPentland, Alex Paulen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRahwan, Iyaden_US
dc.relation.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsAlshamsi, Aamena; Pianesi, Fabio; Lepri, Bruno; Pentland, Alex; Rahwan, Iyaden_US
dspace.embargo.termsNen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-9983
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record