Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAmy E. Keating.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNegron, Christopheren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computational and Systems Biology Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-05T18:23:07Z
dc.date.available2015-02-05T18:23:07Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/93805
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computational and Systems Biology Program, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractLiving cells integrate a vast array of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) to govern cellular functions. For instance, PPIs are critical to biosynthesis, nanostructural assembly, and in processing environmental stimuli through cell-signaling pathways. As fields such as synthetic biology and protein engineering mature they seek to mimic and expand the functions found in living systems that integrate PPIs. A critical feature to many PPIs that are integrated together to perform a complex function is orthogonality, i.e. PPIs that do not cross interact with each other. The engineering of orthogonal PPIs is thus an alluring problem. Since it not only tests our understanding of molecular specificity by having to stabilize and destabilize interactions simultaneously. The results of the design process can also have interesting applications in synthetic biology or bionanotechnology. The coiled coil, a rope-like structure made of helices, is a PPI ubiquitously found in biological systems and is an attractive fold for engineering orthogonal PPIs. Though the coiled coil is well studied, destabilization of undesired interactions still remains challenging. In this thesis I will discuss strategies for obtaining orthogonal PPIs, and describe the current sequence-to-structure relationships known about coiled coils. I will then introduce the computational multistate design framework, CLASSY, and explain how I applied it to the computational design of six orthogonal antiparallel homodimeric coiled coils. Five of these designed sequences were experimentally tested, of which only three of the sequences adopted the target antiparallel homodimer topology. All three of these sequences, as well as a previously designed antiparallel homodimer, were tested for cross reactivity in a pairwise manner. None of these sequences appeared to cross react. The sequences that failed to adopt the antiparallel topology highlight the need for improving our computational design framework. In the final chapter I will discuss strategies to improve our models, and applications for orthogonal antiparallel coiled coils.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Christopher Negron.en_US
dc.format.extent146 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectComputational and Systems Biology Program.en_US
dc.titleComputational design of orthogonal antiparallel homodimeric coiled coilsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computational and Systems Biology Program
dc.identifier.oclc900612420en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record