Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSo, Eric
dc.contributor.advisorVerdi, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorKim, David Sunghyo
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T13:18:04Z
dc.date.available2025-10-21T13:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.date.submitted2025-06-23T18:08:07.464Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/163295
dc.description.abstractI study whether disclosure mandates alter the equilibrium of cyberattacks by unintentionally informing cybercriminals. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) requires companies to disclose their personal information collection practices to consumers, inadvertently informing cybercriminals about the potential benefits of breaching each firm. Using a difference-in-differences design, I find that firms disclosing the collection of valuable personal data face an increased probability of data breaches. These firms also strengthen their cyberdefenses both in terms of cybersecurity software and cybersecurity specialists. Firms trade off cybersecurity costs against the risk of data breaches, with the increase in breach probabilities more pronounced among firms that invest less in cybersecurity. Finally, I find that firms adjust their data collection policies as additional defense strategies. Overall, this study highlights the trade-off between transparency and cybersecurity risks in today’s digital economy.
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.rightsIn Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
dc.rightsCopyright retained by author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
dc.titleCorporate Transparency and Cybersecurity Risks
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreePh.D.
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record