Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNishiguchi, Toshihiro
dc.contributor.authorOue, Shingo
dc.date.accessioned2002-09-04T17:01:59Z
dc.date.available2002-09-04T17:01:59Z
dc.date.issued2002-09-04T17:02:00Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1627
dc.description.abstractThis paper introduces our ongoing analysis of auto component development data obtained from Nishiguchi's research sponsored by MIT's International Motor Vehicle Program (IMVP). The main results of this paper can be found in the section of Research Results where a regression analysis of auto component development productivity is conducted. There are three major findings: 1. Contrary to the general perception, neither component type nor generally accepted project characteristic governs variations of productivity among auto component projects in our study. 2. Even after correcting for component type and differences in project characteristics, there still remains a strong regional gap in productivity between Japanese and Western samples (North America and Europe). 3. Among Japanese suppliers, a counterintuitive relationship between person hours and unique parts ratio was revealed: There is a tendency that person hours decreases as unique parts ratio increases. This relationship should not occur without continuous accumulation of knowledge on the auto components. Nor is it explained solely by a cross-functional feature of organizations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe International Motor Vehicle Program; INSEAD and its Euro-Asia Centreen
dc.format.extent97118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectregional mythen
dc.subjectauto componentsen
dc.subjectJapanen
dc.titleDoes the Regional Myth Still Hold? An Interim Reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record