dc.contributor.author | Alvarez, R. Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodrich, Melanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Hall, Thad E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kiewiet, D. Roderick | |
dc.contributor.author | Sled, Sarah M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-14T16:53:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-14T16:53:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-11-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96546 | |
dc.description.abstract | The October 7, 2003 California Recall Election strained California’s direct democracy. In recent California politics there has not been a statewide election conducted on such short notice; county election officials were informed on July 24 that the election would be held on October 7. Nor has California recently seen a ballot with so many candidates running for a single statewide office. With easy ballot access requirements, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley certified 135 candidates for the official ballot on August 13. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Carnegie Corporation of New York | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | VTP Working Paper Series;9 | |
dc.subject | 2003 California recall election | en_US |
dc.subject | Polling place problems | en_US |
dc.subject | Ballot translation vertical proximity effect | en_US |
dc.subject | Ballot design | en_US |
dc.subject | Survey data | en_US |
dc.title | The Complexity of the California Recall Election | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |