Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaek, Hyoungsu
dc.contributor.authorCalandra, Henri
dc.contributor.authorDemanet, Laurent
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-02T13:03:55Z
dc.date.available2014-10-02T13:03:55Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90512
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the correlation focusing objective functional introduced by van Leeuwen and Mulder to avoid the cycle-skipping problem in full waveform inversion. While some encouraging numerical experiments were reported in the transmission setting, we explain why the method cannot be expected to work for general reflection data. We characterize the form that the adjoint source needs to take for model velocity updates to generate a time delay or a time advance. We show that the adjoint source of correlation focusing takes this desired form in the case of a single primary reflection, but not otherwise. Ultimately, failure owes to the specific form of the normalization present in the correlation focusing objective.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratoryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEarth Resources Laboratory Industry Consortia Annual Report;2013-30
dc.subjectFWI
dc.subjectTomography
dc.subjectInversion
dc.titleThe failure mode of correlation focusing for model velocity estimationen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record