Trust: A Collision of Paradigms
dc.contributor.author | Camp, L. Jean | |
dc.contributor.author | Nissenbaum, Helen | |
dc.contributor.author | McGrath, Cathleen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2002-07-22T17:07:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2002-07-22T17:07:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-07-22T17:07:22Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1509 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this work we survey the findings in social psychology and philosophy with respect to trust. We introduce three hypotheses that remain unanswered with respect to the manner in which humans react to computers. We discuss potential design revisions in light of findings from other disciplines. Then we conclude by noting that research which empowers users in order to be their own security manager may be based on a fundamentally flawed view of human-computer interaction. We close by encouraging designers of computer security systems to examine the humans, which these systems are intended to empower, and recommend that any security system be built on the basis of understanding of human trust provided by the social sciences. | en |
dc.format.extent | 42747 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | trust | en |
dc.subject | paradigms | en |
dc.subject | computer security systems | en |
dc.title | Trust: A Collision of Paradigms | en |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Program on Internet and Telecoms Convergence
Research to identify and shape solutions to technical, economic, or policy hurdles slowing the Internet's evolution as a global communications infrastructure