Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhitney, Daniel E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T01:08:42Z
dc.date.available2016-06-03T01:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2007-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/102889
dc.description.abstractAs products become more complex and their development involves more technologies, people, and companies, it is no longer sufficient to ensure that each part, component, or subsystem is designed and made correctly. Problems that involve many distinct elements can still arise, even if each is designed according to the specifications. Practitioners speak of Murphy’s Law and “sneak paths,” while academics refer to “emergent properties” and “undocumented interactions.” The goal of this paper is to look at this problem from the outside, focusing on Ford and two non-competing companies whose products are also complex: United Technologies and Boeing. Interviews were conducted with senior management and lower level supervisors, focusing on both official processes and anecdotal reports on what works and what does not.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesESD Working Papers;ESD-WP-2007-12
dc.titleCombating System-Level Quality Problems in Complex Product Developmenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record